ONDAS GRAVITATORIAS y primera evidencia de Inflación Cósmica

ONDAS GRAVITATORIAS: Hoy puede ser un gran día para la física, (y tal vez tan mediático como aquel 4 de julio del 2012 cuando se anunció el descubrimiento del bosón de Higgs) ya que hoy a las 16 hs. UTC (13 hs. de Uruguay) el Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) dará una conferencia de prensa, y suenan fuertes rumores de que se anunciará la detección de modos B en el fondo cósmico de microondas por parte del experimento BICEP2. Esto significaría indirectamente dos cosas: Ondas gravitatorias procedentes del período inflacionario y una casi evidencia del modelo inflacionario. Como si fuera poco al parecer estará presente en la conferencia de prensa nada menos que ALAN GUTH, el "padre" de la inflación cósmica.

Significará el premio Nobel de Física 2015 para Alan Guth? Muy apresurado?

#GravityWaves
#Inflation
#ModoB

Press Conference:
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=42751
http://spaceref.com/astronomy/first-direct-evidence-of-cosmic-inflation.html
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=42793

Alan Guth, Bob Wilson y Andrei Linde esta tarde en la conferencia de prensa de BICEP2 en el CfA.

.: CONFERENCIA DE PRENSA :.


ACTUALIZACIÓN:
Sitio oficial de BICEP2: http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/CMB/bicep2/
Resultados anunciados por BICEP2 (17/3/2014): http://bicepkeck.org/
El instrumento BICEP2 ubicado el Polo Sur: http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/CMB/bicep2/instrument.html
Nature: http://www.nature.com/news/all-you-need-to-know-about-gravitational-waves-1.14886
Anuncio en Caltech: http://www.caltech.edu/content/first-direct-evidence-inflation-and-primordial-gravitational-waves
Publicación de Bicep2 en PRL. Las señales podrían ser de polvo galáctico. Junio 2014: http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101
Video de PHD Comics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_llA2q1rlSg

ACTUALIZCIÓN 2:
2014-sep-19: Anuncio de sonda Planck.
Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes. http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.5738
Sean Carroll: Planck Speaks: Bad News for Primordial Gravitational Waves?
Hontas: Farmer: BICEP2's vision wasn't that strong, Planck says their window was too dusty.
Francis Villatoro: BICEP2 y los nuevos resultados sobre el polvo galáctico del telescopio Planck.




VRLde Bicep2IDEO: El momento en que sorprenden a Andrei Linde con el resultado de BICEP2, días atrás en Stanford University. Linde es uno de los pioneros del modelo inflacionario (junto con Alan Guth) y podría merecer el Nobel de Física 2015 tras esta evidencia experimental anunciada en el día de hoy. BICEP2 anunció esta tarde la detección por primera vez de modos B en el radiación cósmica de fondo, los cuales son evidencia de ondas gravitatorias primordiales procedentes del período inflacionario ocurrido tras el Big-Bang.

Prensa y otras notas relacionadas:
http://francis.naukas.com/2014/03/17/bicep2-obtiene-la-primera-prueba-directa-de-la-inflacion-cosmica/
http://francis.naukas.com/2014/03/17/la-inflacion-cosmica-y-el-multiverso-inflacionario/
http://cuentos-cuanticos.com/2014/03/18/el-universo-saca-bicep2/
NY Times
BBC Ciencia
Colección de artículos sobre el tema de la revista Investigación y Ciencia.
http://profmattstrassler.com/2014/03/18/if-its-holds-up-what-might-bicep2s-discovery-mean/

http://conexioncausal.wordpress.com/2014/03/17/descubrimiento-de-modos-b-en-la-polarizacion-del-cmb/

Entrevista a Rodolfo Gambini en No Toquen Nada, 93.9 Océano FM, Montevideo, Uruguay, 21/4/2014. 
[audio]

 Alan Guth, Paul Steinhardt , Andrei Linde recibiendo la medalla Dirac 2002 del ICTP.
por desarrollar el concepto de inflación en cosmología.  

Resumen de resultados publicados por BICEP2 en
http://bicepkeck.org/faq.html

About the detection

  • Have you detected B-modes from inflation
    We have detected B-mode polarization at precisely the angular scales where the inflationary signal is expected to peak with very high significance (> 5 sigma). We have extensively studied possible contamination from instrumental effects and feel confident we can limit them to much smaller than the observed signal. Inflationary gravitational waves appear to be by far the most likely explanation for the signal we see.
  • Couldn’t it just be galactic emission or polarized dust?
    The data disfavor this. The best current models of polarized galactic emission in our observing region show it to be much fainter than the signal we see. Also, there is little evidence for correlation between our B-mode maps and the predicted pattern from the galaxy. Finally, within our own data, the “color” of the B-modes found by comparing different frequencies is consistent with CMB but disfavors galactic contamination.
  • Have you detected a gravitational wave?
    The frequency of the cosmic gravitational waves is very low, so we are not able to follow the temporal modulation. However, we are indeed directly observing a snapshot of gravitational waves through their imprints on matter and radiation over space. Ordinary density perturbations cannot create the pattern we observe. The presence of a water wave can be detected by feeling its up-and-down motion or by taking a picture of it. We are doing the latter.

About the science

  • What is B-mode polarization and how is it generated by inflation?
    Measuring the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background at different points on the sky determines a direction and polarized intensity (the polarized intensity of the CMB is less than 1/1,000,000 its total brightness). This can be visualized as a map of little line segments at every spot on the sky, the patterns of which we analyze. B-mode polarization is essentially the swirly part of that pattern (known mathematically as the ‘curl’). For the density fluctuations that generate most of the polarization of the CMB this part of the primordial pattern is exactly zero.
    [This is because density flows in the early universe go into or out of dense regions, and the polarization lines up with these flows in a way that doesn't swirl, producing only so-called E-mode polarization. To generate a B-mode pattern in the early universe you need gravitational waves.]
    Inflation magnifies quantum fluctuations, which exist even in vacuum. The quantum fluctuations in the inflation field itself (“inflaton”) become the density fluctuations seen in the CMB and at much later times in galaxy distributions. During inflation, the quantum fluctuations in gravity (“graviton”) become long wavelength gravitational waves that produced the B-mode we see.
  • Wasn’t B-mode polarization detected last year?
    Yes - but a different kind. Last summer the 10-meter South Pole Telescope announced the first evidence for B-mode polarization in the CMB on arcminute scales which arises from the lensing, or bending of light, by gravitational attraction of structures formed in the relatively recent universe. Recently a second telescope, Polarbear, has also detected this effect. Our data sees this lensing effect too, but what is critical is that we see strong B-mode polarization at the much larger angular scales--2 to 4 degrees on the sky--where lensing is a tiny effect but where inflationary gravitational waves are expected to peak.
  • Didn’t Planck find that r < 0.11? Do your experiments disagree?
    Our measurements don’t disagree. Constraints on the gravitational-wave background level r reported from Planck and previous experiments are not from measurements of B-mode polarization. Instead, they come from the CMB temperature measurements which show surprisingly low power at the largest scales, implying little room for an additional contribution from tensors in the context of the simplest models. B-mode measurements like ours aim to directly measure the inflationary gravitational-wave pattern itself at the degree angular scales where it should peak. The tension between the high level of B-mode polarization we see and the apparent low power at large scales may be a statistical fluke, but many possible extensions to the simplest model could also relieve this apparent tension.
  • Are you claiming you’ve detected running of the spectral index?
    No. Running is a commonly-studied modification to the simplest Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) model in which the slope of primordial spectrum is allowed to change from large to small scales, but it is only one of the possible model extensions that could relieve tension between a high value of r and the low large-scale temperature spectrum. We only choose it as an example because it is simple and familiar from analyses by Planck and other teams. We anticipate that cosmologists will think broadly about possible parameter shifts or model extensions.
  • Will your data/maps be made public?
    Yes. The papers describing the results we present today are available for download on our webpage right now (and will be on arXiv tomorrow morning). The B-mode results and the information needed to do cosmological analyses with them are available for download now. The maps we’ve shown, including the high signal-to-noise images of B-mode polarization, will eventually also be released in digital form with the information needed to re-analyze and compare them to independent observations (though this will take us a while).

About the project

  • Why the South Pole?
    Water vapor in the atmosphere absorbs microwaves, making detailed studies of the CMB impossible from most places on earth. The South Pole is near the middle of the Antarctic plateau, the driest environment on the planet. At an effective altitude of over 10,000 feet (~3000 meters), stable weather patterns and winter temperatures averaging -72F (-58C), the South Pole is the closest a ground-based telescope can get to being in space. The patch of sky we study is visible from the South Pole continuously, 24h each day for the whole year. The National Science Foundation’s US Antarctic Program, which operates the South Pole Station, provides excellent infrastructure, communications, and support for the small team needed to run our telescopes, including our winterover scientists Steffen Richter and Robert Schwarz.
  • Who funds BICEP2 / this project?
    BICEP2 is funded by the National Science Foundation. Like the other telescopes in our BICEP and Keck Array series of experiments, NSF has supported its construction and operation, and also runs the South Pole Station where all our telescopes observe. The Keck Foundation has also contributed major funding for construction of our telescopes. NASA, JPL, and the Moore Foundation have generously supported the development of the ultra-sensitive detector array technology which make these measurements possible.
  • Who leads BICEP2?
    John Kovac has led the BICEP2 experiment. Clem Pryke has led the analysis that produced today’s results. Jamie Bock contributed the optical concept for the experiment and developed the detector array technology. Chao-Lin Kuo designed the polarization sensitive detectors used in BICEP2 and is leading the next major telescope in this series, BICEP3. BICEP2 is the second stage of a coordinated program, the BICEP and Keck Array series of experiments, developed for the South Pole. This coordinated program has a co-PI structure. The four PIs of this series are John Kovac (Harvard), Clem Pryke (UMN), Jamie Bock (Caltech/JPL), and Chao-Lin Kuo (Stanford/SLAC). All have worked together on the present result, along with talented teams of students and scientists. Other major collaborating institutions for BICEP2 include UCSD, UBC, NIST, University of Toronto, Cardiff, and CEA.
  • What does "BICEP2" stand for? 
    Officially, "BICEP2" is not an acronym. It's simply a name.
  • How big is your team?
    Although we have twelve collaborating institutions (see above) the core team working on this result has been relatively small for a major science project--a few dozen people. We’d like to particularly highlight the contribution of our dedicated graduate students Randol Aikin, Justus Brevik, Kirit Karkare, Jon Kaufman, Sarah Kernasovskiy, Chris Sheehy, Grant Teply, Jamie Tolan, and Chin Lin Wong. Our project postdocs have also included Colin Bischoff, Immanuel Buder, Jeff Filippini, Stefan Fliescher, Martin Lueker, Roger O’Brient, Walt Ogburn, Angiola Orlando, Zak Staniszewski, and Abigail Vieregg.
  • Are there competing experiments?
    Indeed yes, this is a highly competitive field. There are currently about a dozen ground-based and balloon-borne telescopes that are targeting the goal of measuring B-mode polarization. Many of them are described in this recent review. In addition, polarization data from ESA's Planck satellite are eagerly anticipated. We look forward to results from these experiments which we hope will confirm and further extend the detection we report today.
  • What comes next?
    In the coming months our team plans to release improved data from the Keck Array, which will further test the BICEP2 detection at 150 GHz and add improved sensitivity at 95 GHz to further constrain foregrounds. By the end of this year the Planck satellite will release its polarization results. Of course we look forward to hearing results from other experiments which can test these results, and extend the frequency and angular coverage. We expect rapid progress. On a somewhat longer timescale, a detected signal at this amplitude raises exciting possibilities for studying inflation through more precise CMB polarization measurements over the entire sky which will spur the community to develop a new generation of ground-based and space-borne experiments.

El equipo de BICEP2

El BICEP2 en el Polo Sur.

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Los mitos del alunizaje

Einstein: Sobre la Electrodinámica de los Cuerpos en Movimiento

¿Qué invadimos ahora?

Noam Chomsky - Requiem por el Sueño Americano

Solución al problema de medir aceleraciones usando un teléfono inteligente: enfrentando a la relatividad general.

Física: El principio de equivalencia o cómo resolver el problema de medir ángulos y aceleraciones reales con Smartphones

La Física de Usain Bolt